WATKINS, Judge.
This appeal involves an alleged verbal contract for the exchange of property between the plaintiff and defendant, and subsequent improvements to the defendant's property. The trial court concluded that there was no contract and that the plaintiff and defendant should be returned to their original status. The court further held the defendant liable for the cost of improvements and storage of his property while it was in the plaintiff's custody. We amend...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
