1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 141 A.D.2d
  5. 141 A.D.2d 897 (1988)
 

ROUCEK v. HEWSON

141 A.D.2d 897 (1988)

Sheryl L. Roucek, an Infant, by Fred Roucek, Her Parent, Respondent, et al., Plaintiff, v. Charles Hewson, Appellant, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

June 2, 1988

Mikoll, J.

The primary issue raised here is whether the evidence presented by plaintiff Sheryl L. Roucek (hereinafter plaintiff) was sufficient to support the verdict against defendant Charles Hewson (hereinafter defendant). To set aside the jury verdict, as defendant seeks, we must find that there is no permissible inference or valid line of reasoning which could lead rational people to the conclusion reached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases