1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 863 F.2d
  5. 863 F.2d 174 (1988)
 

SANTOS-MARTINEZ v. SOTO-SANTIAGO

No. 88-1217.

863 F.2d 174 (1988)

Angel David SANTOS-MARTINEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Victor M. SOTO-SANTIAGO, etc., et al., Defendants, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided December 19, 1988.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied January 31, 1989.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Juan Lorenzo Rodriguez Quesada, Arecibo, P.R., with whom Luis Munoz Rivera, Hato Rey, P.R., and Pedro Miranda Corrada, San Juan, P.R., were on brief, for appellants.

Miguel Pagan, San Juan, P.R., with whom Eliezer Aldarondo Ortiz and Aldarondo & Lopez Bras, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for appellees.

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, WISDOM, Senior Circuit Judge, and COFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied January 31, 1989.

LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.

Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c) provides that a notice of appeal "shall specify the party or parties taking the appeal." Earlier this year, in Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co., ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 2405, 101 L.Ed.2d 285 (1988), the Supreme Court made clear that this specificity about who is appealing is a jurisdictional requirement. Id., 108 S...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases