1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 852 F.2d
  5. 852 F.2d 185 (1988)
 

BAILEY v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RY. CO.

No. 87-1733.

852 F.2d 185 (1988)

Wayne L. BAILEY, et al., for Themselves and for all Other Employees Herein as Group II Employees, Chessie System, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY CO., also Known as the Chessie System and the National Maritime Union of America, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided July 20, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter J. Wadel, argued, Wadel & Bulger, P.C., Ludington, Mich., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kevin B. Krauss, James L. Wernstrom, Law, Weathers & Richardson, Grand Rapids, Mich., Robert E. Swickle, The Jaques Admiralty Law Firm, Detroit, Mich., for Chesapeake and Ohio Ry. Co.

Sidney H. Kalban, argued, Cappiello, Hofman & Katz P.C., New York City, for Nat. Maritime Union.

Before KEITH and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges, and EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge.

WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, members of the National Maritime Union (the Union), until recently were employed by the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway (C & O). They claim that it was error for the district court to dismiss their claim based upon the statute of limitations. We affirm.

The events leading to this lawsuit began when C & O, based on continuing losses, decided to sell its ferry operations to another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases