KATZEN v. KNUCK

No. 88-739.

530 So.2d 502 (1988)

Jerry B. KATZEN, H. Stephen Rash, and Rash & Katzen, P.A., Petitioners, v. The Honorable Francis X. KNUCK, Respondent.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

September 6, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gold & Fox, P.A., and Myron M. Gold, Miami, for petitioners.

Lapidus & Frankel, P.A., and Richard L. Lapidus, Miami, for respondent.

Before NESBITT, DANIEL S. PEARSON and JORGENSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

The petitioners seek a writ of prohibition to disqualify the respondent from conducting further proceedings in the underlying garnishment litigation. For well over one year, both parties to the litigation mistakenly filed pleadings in another division of the trial court although the action had been assigned to the respondent's division. When the error came to light, the petitioners filed a sworn motion to disqualify, citing as grounds therefore several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases