In this proceeding pursuant to Mental Hygiene Law article 77, respondents raise a number of procedural and substantive questions. First, they claim that the proposed conservatee, respondent William J. Foley, was not properly served with notice of the petition, as required by Mental Hygiene Law § 77.07 (a). Our review of the motion papers on this issue discloses the following facts. Petitioner's attorney obtained an
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
MATTER OF FOLEY
140 A.D.2d 892 (1988)
In the Matter of William J. Foley. Florence Messina, Respondent; William J. Foley et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 26, 1988
May 26, 1988
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
