1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 676 F.Supp.
  5. 676 F.Supp. 351 (1988)
 

ROBERTSON v. McCLOSKEY

Civ. A. No. 86-2877.

676 F.Supp. 351 (1988)

Marion G. ROBERTSON, Plaintiff, v. Paul N. McCLOSKEY, Jr., Defendant.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

January 15, 1988.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas V. Rigler, Kaplan, Russin & Vecchi, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

George A. Lehner, Sloan, Lehner & Ruiz, Washington, D.C., for defendant: Roger C. Spaeder, Zuckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, Washington, D.C., cocounsel.

OPINION AND ORDER

JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.

Presently pending before the Court is defendant's motion in limine seeking to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Matthew Erdelyi and plaintiff's opposition thereto. For the reasons outlined below, this motion will be granted.

I. Background

Dr. Erdelyi states that he is an expert in "the psychodynamics of memory and perception." See Rule 26(b)(4) Statement at 1.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases