PERRY v. GARRETT

No. 87-2305.

530 So.2d 493 (1988)

Arthur PERRY, Appellant, v. James H. GARRETT and Norma C. Garrett, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

September 2, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John S. Matthews, Tampa, for appellant.

G. Michael Nelson of Yado, Keel, Nelson & Bergmann, P.A., Tampa, for appellees.


PER CURIAM.

In this action based upon what we find to be a valid contract for a sum of money owed between the appellant and the appellees, the trial court ruled upon the merits of the case at a premature stage of the proceedings when it had only the appellees' complaint and the appellant's answer before it. We find it was error for the court to have so ruled without an evidentiary hearing. Compare Snyder v. Cheezem Development Corp., 373 So...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases