PARRANTO BROS. v. CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON

No. C4-87-2423.

425 N.W.2d 585 (1988)

PARRANTO BROTHERS, INC., Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied July 28, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William M. Mahlum, Christina Stalker, Mahlum & Associates, St. Paul, for appellant.

John F. Bannigan, Jr., James J. Hanton, Bannigan & Kelly, St. Paul, for respondents.

Thomas L. Grundhoefer, League of Minnesota Cities, St. Paul, amicus curiae League of Minnesota Cities.

Heard, considered and decided by RANDALL, P.J., and PARKER and KALITOWSKI, JJ.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Parranto Brothers, Inc. appeals the decision of the district court, which found the City of New Brighton's decision to rezone the subject property was a valid exercise of its legislative power. The court also found that the rezoning did not constitute a taking of appellant's property. We affirm.

FACTS

In February 1975, appellant Parranto Brothers, Inc. (Parranto) purchased an interest in the subject property....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases