STEINKE v. STEINKE

No. C2-88-910.

428 N.W.2d 579 (1988)

In re the Marriage of Edwin Arthur STEINKE, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Kathleen Hope STEINKE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 23, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John J. Brossart, Tanner & Ring, P.A., Hastings, for petitioner, respondent.

Lorraine S. Clugg, Bloomington, for appellant.

Considered and decided by LANSING, P.J., and SCHULTZ and LOMMEN, JJ., without oral argument.


OPINION

A. PAUL LOMMEN, Judge.

Kathleen Hope Steinke appeals the trial court's order for joint physical custody of the party's three children, contests certain child support and debt obligations ordered by the trial court, and seeks attorney fees incurred in this appeal. We reverse the trial court's physical custody decision, because the court failed to apply the Pikula factors and determine which parent was the primary caretaker.

FACTS<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases