VANOSKI v. THOMSON

No. 16501.

757 P.2d 244 (1988)

114 Idaho 381

Kenneth VANOSKI and Penelope J. Hieb, formerly known as Penelope J. Vanoski, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. Betty J. THOMSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Idaho.

Petition for Review Denied September 8, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James G. Reid of Ringert, Clark, Harrington, Christenson & Kaufman, Boise, for defendant-appellant.

Iver J. Longeteig, Boise, for plaintiff-respondent, Vanoski.

Patrick D. Costello of Martin, Chapman, Park & Burkett, Boise, for plaintiff-respondent, Hieb.


SUBSTITUTE OPINION

The Court's prior opinion, dated February 3, 1988, is hereby withdrawn.

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the district court holding a debtor liable on a promissory note. We are presented with two questions: whether the district court erred in admitting parol evidence of the intent of the parties to a transaction releasing a security for the debt; and whether the obligees on the note were estopped from seeking...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases