CONCERNED TENANTS OF FATHER PANIK VILLAGE v. PIERCE

Civ. No. B-87-809 (TFGD).

685 F.Supp. 316 (1988)

CONCERNED TENANTS ASSOCIATION OF FATHER PANIK VILLAGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Samuel PIERCE, Secretary of the United States Dept. of Housing and Urban Development, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

May 9, 1988.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Solomen, Michael O. Sheehan, Jerome N. Frank Legal Services, New Haven, Conn., for plaintiffs.

Barry K. Stevens, Asst. U.S. Atty., Bridgeport, Conn., Frank K. Santoro, Asst. U.S. Atty., New Haven, Conn., for Pierce.

Eric L. Reinken, Edward M. Kweskin, Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky, Joseph A. Siciliano, Stamford, Conn., for Craig & BHA.


RULING ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

DALY, Chief Judge.

The Concerned Tenants Association of Father Panik Village, along with thirteen named residents of Father Panik Village, have filed a class action suit in the above-captioned matter on behalf of more than 700 resident families to redress the allegedly dangerous, indecent, and unsanitary living conditions at Father Panik Village, a low-income housing project in Bridgeport, Connecticut. In particular...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases