ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN


9 N.J. Tax 90 (1987)

ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWNSHIP OF WEEHAWKEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ROMULUS DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. TOWN OF WEST NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 5, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Venino & Venino, attorneys for the appellant Township of Weehawkin (Richard Venino of counsel and on the brief).

Sidney I. Turtz, attorney for the appellant Town of West New York.

McCarter & English, attorneys for respondent (William T. Reilly of counsel; Frank E. Ferruggia on the brief).

Before Judges FURMAN, DREIER and SHEBELL.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lasser in his opinion published at 7 N.J.Tax 305 ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases