CITY OF FULTONDALE v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM

85-1159, 85-1440.

507 So.2d 489 (1987)

CITY OF FULTONDALE, et al. v. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, et al. CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. CITY OF TRUSSVILLE.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 24, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Scott Greene of Bishop, Colvin & Johnson, Birmingham, for appellant City of Fultondale.

James K. Baker, City Atty., and David J. Vann of Carlton, Vann & Stichweh, Birmingham, for appellant City of Birmingham in No. 85-1440.

David J. Vann of Carlton, Vann & Stichweh, Birmingham, for appellee City of Birmingham in No. 85-1159.

Carl E. Johnson of Bishop, Colvin & Johnson, Birmingham, for appellee City of Trussville.


PER CURIAM.

Fultondale and Trussville filed separate actions against Birmingham, challenging the validity of annexation actions taken by Birmingham and seeking declaratory and injunctive relief. Birmingham filed counterclaims, alleging that certain purported annexations by Fultondale and Trussville were improper. These cases were consolidated for appellate review.

Acting pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 32, Acts of Alabama 1964, p. 54, Fultondale...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases