The primary issue asserted by defendant on this appeal is that the seizure of the weapon which he ultimately pleaded guilty to illegally possessing was made as a result of an unconstitutional search of his vehicle. On March 31, 1986, a suppression hearing was held and extensive testimony was taken in attempting to establish, inter alia, whether the inventory search of defendant's vehicle was done for legitimate administrative purposes...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
