Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's claim that the trial court erred in admitting certain testimony of the arresting officer which implicitly bolstered the complainant's identification testimony has not been preserved for our review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). We decline to review the issue in the interest of justice given the nature of the proof against the defendant.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
