Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the case is remitted to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).
The defendant's claim that his motion to suppress identification testimony was improperly denied was specifically raised and implicitly rejected on his prior appeal, which resulted in the granting of a new trial on another ground (People v Perrino,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.