Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was deprived of a fair trial in view of certain remarks made by the prosecutor during summation and the trial court's failure to submit an identification charge to the jury. These claims, however, are unpreserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to object at trial either to the subject remarks or to the charge (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). Furthermore, the claims do not state a basis...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
