Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.
Memorandum:
The sole expert evidence offered by claimant regarding the medical malpractice of defendant's physicians was the testimony of a psychiatrist. The court accorded his testimony little, if any, probative weight. The amount of weight to be accorded the expert's testimony was for the court, as trier of the facts, to determine (see, Richardson, Evidence § 367 [Prince 10th ed]), and we find no basis...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
