AMSTERDAM v. GOLDSTICK


136 Misc.2d 831 (1987)

Robert Amsterdam et al., Petitioners, v. David T. Goldstick et al., Respondents.

Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County.

September 3, 1987


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Amsterda, petitioner pro se. Lydia Paglio, petitioner pro se. Thomas Stats, petitioner pro se. Ronnie Roth, Bruce Kramer and Rosenberg & Estis, P. C. (Franklin R. Kaiman of counsel), for respondents.


LEWIS R. FRIEDMAN, J.

This case was initiated by pro se tenants to obtain correction of the violations at the premises and to seek the imposition of civil penalties. After a trial on the injunction questions, the court issued an order requiring the violations referred to in the petition to be removed and determined that Mark Greenberg was not qualified to serve as managing agent. (Amsterdam v Goldstick...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases