1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 658 F.Supp.
  5. 658 F.Supp. 287 (1987)
 

CONTINENTAL CAMERAS CO., INC. v. FOA & SON CORP.

No. 86 Civ 6985 (LBS).

658 F.Supp. 287 (1987)

CONTINENTAL CAMERAS CO., INC. and Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co., Plaintiffs, v. FOA & SON CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 29, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ben-Veniste & Shernoff, Washington, D.C., Thomas J. Fitzpatrick, New York City (Peter D. Isakoff, Washington, D.C., of counsel), for plaintiffs.

Rivkin, Radler, Dunne & Bayh, Uniondale, N.Y. (Howard J. Newman, Frank J. Giliberti, of counsel), for defendant.

SAND, District Judge.

Defendant FOA & Son Corporation ("FOA") moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the grounds that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The motion, which arises from a dispute between an insured party and its insurance broker, requires an analysis of the somewhat blurred contours of admiralty jurisdiction. For the reasons explained, the motion to dismiss is granted.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases