Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On the instant appeal, the defendant argues that the hearing court improperly restricted defense counsel's cross-examination of the arresting detective during the suppression hearing. We disagree.
Prior to the taking of testimony at the suppression hearing, the People conceded that the arresting detective spoke with a confidential informant before entering a bar and arresting the defendant. During the course of the suppression...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.