BARRETT v. D & H DRYWALL

WCB No. 81-02757; CA A41385.

740 P.2d 203 (1987)

86 Or.App. 605

In the matter of the Compensation of David F. BARRETT, Claimant. David F. Barrett, Petitioner, v. D & H DRYWALL and Ebi Companies, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 29, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Malagon & Moore, Eugene.

Kenneth L. Kleinsmith, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Meyers & Terrall, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


ROSSMAN, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board on remand from the Supreme Court. This is round two concerning the extent of claimant's permanent disability from a compensable back injury. At the end of the first round, the Supreme Court remanded the case to the Board to determine whether claimant's injury had caused his preexisting noncompensable osteoarthritis to become symptomatic and instructed the Board to consider any permanently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases