STEFFL v. ROEDIGER

No. C7-86-2230.

406 N.W.2d 535 (1987)

Michael STEFFL d.b.a. Steffl Well Drilling, Respondent, v. Paul ROEDIGER, et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 19, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Brian O'Leary, O'Leary & Moritz, Chartered, Springfield, for respondent.

Mark J. Schneider, Neeser Law Office, Willmar, for appellants.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and HUSPENI and MULALLY, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Paul and Phyllis Roediger appeal from a judgment enforcing and foreclosing a mechanic's lien in favor of Michael Steffl. The Roedigers argue that the trial court erred in entering judgment for Steffl because he had not substantially performed the contract and in enforcing a mechanic's lien because the statutory notice requirements for creating such a lien had not been met. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases