PINERO v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY

No. 86-1926.

515 So.2d 422 (1987)

Dionisio Jesus PINERO, et al., Appellants, v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 17, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Horton, Perse & Ginsberg and Edward Perse, Ratiner & Glinn, Miami, for appellants.

Daniels & Hicks and Lisa M. Berlow-Lehner, Dixon, Dixon, Hurst & Nicklaus and Ralph O. Anderson, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

On the authority of this court's decision in Henley v. J.I. Case Co., 510 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), we reverse the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Sears, Roebuck & Company. We certify the same question as was certified in Henley to the supreme court as being of great public importance:

DOES THE STATUTE OF REPOSE BAR A WRONGFUL DEATH ACTION

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases