1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 140 Wis.2d
  5. 140 Wis.2d 792 (1987)
 

DYSON v. HEMPE

No. 85-1933.

140 Wis.2d 792 (1987)

413 N.W.2d 379

Janice DYSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. A. Henry HEMPE, Charles A. Holznecht, and George Blakely, Defendants-Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided July 23, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff-appellant there were briefs by John H. Correll of Milwaukee, and Thomas M. Croke of counsel, of Milwaukee, and oral argument by John H. Correll.

For the defendant-respondent there was a brief by Robert J. Ruth and Bolgrien, Ruth & Rentz, S.C., of Beloit, and oral argument by Robert J. Ruth.

Before Gartzke, P.J., Eich and Sundby, JJ.

SUNDBY, J.

Janice Dyson appeals judgments dismissing her legal malpractice action pursuant to sec. 804.12(2)(a)3, Stats., with prejudice and costs, as a sanction for failing to make discovery. She brought this action against three attorneys who represented her in her divorce action at different times. At defendants' oral examination of Dyson pursuant to sec. 804.05, she failed to produce requested documents and refused to answer a number of questions, asserting several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases