Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's argument that his exculpatory statement made to the arresting officer after his arrest should have been admitted during the cross-examination testimony of that officer, is without merit. The defendant did not argue before the Trial Judge, nor does he argue on appeal, that this hearsay testimony falls within any exception to the hearsay rule (see, People v Sostre,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
