Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the police acted on inherently unreliable or suspect information in effectuating his arrest, and that, therefore, his statements should have been suppressed as the fruit of an arrest premised on less than probable cause. We find this contention to be without merit. The police obtained the information on which they relied in a face-to-face interview (see, People v Crosby,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.