Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The court properly instructed the jury in the section of its charge on criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree that under the law of this State, if it found that the defendant was in exclusive and unexplained possession of recently stolen property, then they could permissibly draw an inference that such possession was guilty possession (see, People v Leotta,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.