CUEVAS v. MONTOYA

No. 7603-2-III.

48 Wn. App. 871 (1987)

740 P.2d 858

DANIEL CUEVAS, ET AL, Appellants, v. RICHARD MONTOYA, Respondent.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

June 23, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven Clem and Clem & Zanol, P.S., for appellants.

Fred Montoya and Montoya & Kinkley, for respondent.


McINTURFF, C.J.

Daniel and Shirley Cuevas sued Richard Montoya, claiming he charged them excessive attorney fees, usurious interest rates and violated the Consumer Protection Act. Mr. Montoya answered, claiming that the Cuevases owed him attorney fees, and sought collection on a promissory note. The two actions were consolidated. The Superior Court reformed a statutory warranty deed to a mortgage and awarded Mr. Montoya judgments for attorney fees, the balance due...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases