DIGGS v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

No. BR-261.

503 So.2d 412 (1987)

Thomas Duane DIGGS, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

February 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Diggs, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Gary L. Printy, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondents.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioner filed a petition for writ of mandamus alleging that respondent refused to credit his sentence with time previously served, as ordered by the sentencing judge. The allegations of the petition, if true, showed that petitioner is presently under illegal constraint. Therefore, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.040, the petition was treated as a petition for writ of habeas corpus and the state was ordered to show cause why the petition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases