Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that he was denied his right to retain counsel of his own choosing because the trial court failed to grant a continuance to permit him to substitute retained counsel for his assigned counsel. Whether such a continuance should be granted is largely within the discretion of the Trial Judge, and depends upon the particular facts of the case (see, People v Arroyave,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.