1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 824 F.2d
  5. 824 F.2d 84 (1987)
 

TIDLER v. ELI LILLY AND CO., INC.

No. 85-5981.

824 F.2d 84 (1987)

Suzanne E. TIDLER, et al., Appellants Helene Mankowitz, et al. v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, INC. (Two Cases).

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

July 24, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Aaron M. Levine, Washington, D.C., was on appellants' response to order to show cause.

James A. Hourihan, Gail L. Heriot and Terri A. Steinhaus, Washington, D.C., were on appellee Eli Lilly and Company's response to the response of appellants to order to show cause.

Before WALD, Chief Judge, and MIKVA and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion PER CURIAM.

ON ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

PER CURIAM:

This action stems from a product liability suit for damages related to ingestion of diethylstilbestrol ("DES") allegedly manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company, Inc. (hereafter "Lilly"). On August 23, 1985, the district court granted Lilly's motion for summary judgment as to eight of the nine plaintiffs. Proceedings in the suit by the ninth plaintiff continued in the district court.

Appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases