1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 842 F.2d
  5. 842 F.2d 64 (1987)
 

MORRASH v. STROBEL

Nos. 85-1918(L), 85-1939, 85-1998, 85-2002 and 86-3552.

842 F.2d 64 (1987)

Joseph MORRASH and Morton Ford, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Charles Cox, Plaintiff, v. Charles STROBEL, Defendant-Appellant. and John R. Stedman, City of Alexandria; Defendant. Joseph MORRASH, Charles Cox and Morton Ford, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Charles STROBEL and City of Alexandria, Defendants-Appellees. and John R. Stedman, Defendant. Joseph MORRASH, Charles Cox and Morton Ford, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, Defendant-Appellant. and Charles Strobel, John R. Stedman, Defendants. Joseph MORRASH and Morton Ford, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Charles Cox, Plaintiff, v. Charles STROBEL, City of Alexandria, Defendants-Appellees. and John R. Stedman, Defendant. Joseph MORRASH and Morton Ford, Charles Cox, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Charles STROBEL, Defendant-Appellee. and John R. Stedman, City of Alexandria, Defendants.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided October 6, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A.W. Boraks, Washington, D.C. (Mary E. Craig, Reston, Va., on brief), for defendant-appellant.

Susan M. Cardenas, Joseph F. Cunningham (David G. Fiske, Thomas & Fiske, P.C.; David D. Hudgins, William H. Atwill, Jr., Cunningham & Hudgins, Alexandria, Va., on brief), for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before PHILLIPS and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BOYLE, District Judge for the Eastern District of North Carolina, sitting by designation.

TERRENCE WILLIAM BOYLE, District Judge:

In this civil rights case, three Alexandria, Virginia, policemen sued the City and its Public Safety Director claiming that their constitutional rights were deprived by the defendants. All of the plaintiffs claim that they were "whistle blowers" who pursued and exposed police misconduct. The plaintiffs claim that in return for their efforts to expose corruption they were singled out by the defendants for retaliation resulting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases