STATE v. HATTON

No. CX-87-210.

405 N.W.2d 498 (1987)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Mark Lamont HATTON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted June 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey III, Minnesota Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Thomas L. Johnson, Hennepin Co. Atty., Vernon E. Bergstrom, Chief, Appellate Section, and Beverly J. Wolfe, Asst. Co. Atty., Minneapolis, for respondent.

C. Paul Jones, State Public Defender, and Mark F. Anderson, Asst. State Public Defender, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and LANSING and RANDALL, JJ., with oral argument waived.


OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

After sentencing, appellant Mark Lamont Hatton moved for reduction of his sentence. He claimed his criminal history score had been miscalculated on the high side at sentencing when the trial court determined his criminal history score was 2, and that the presumptive sentence for his criminal sexual conduct conviction was 65 months. After determining that 65 months was the presumptive sentence based on a score of 2, the court examined...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases