FLAUGHER v. CONE AUTOMATIC MACHINE CO.

No. 86-929.

30 Ohio St. 3d 60 (1987)

FLAUGHER ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CONE AUTOMATIC MACHINE CO. ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 22, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lindhorst & Dreidame Co., L.P.A., and Jay R. Langenbahn, for appellants.

McCaslin, Imbus & McCaslin and R. Gary Winters, for appellees.


DOUGLAS, J.

The instant appeal presents this court with three separate questions. The first is whether either of the appellee corporations falls within a recognized exception to the traditional rule of successor non-liability. Secondly, we are urged to adopt the "product line" theory of liability as espoused in Ray v. Alad Corp., supra. The final question is whether appellees had a duty to warn appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases