CICILESS v. LANE


129 A.D.2d 759 (1987)

Catherine Ciciless et al., Respondents, v. Jules V. Lane et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 27, 1987


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the motion is granted.

The plaintiffs' contention that the intermittent treatment of Mrs. Ciciless by the defendant Dr. Rothman, which was rendered over a period of approximately eight years and which consisted of disparate procedures on different teeth performed after substantial time gaps, constitutes continuous treatment is unsupported by the record. The plaintiffs have failed to sustain their burden...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases