Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The appellant contends that at the suppression hearing, the court improperly refused to permit testimony concerning a showup at the police precinct, at which time the complainants allegedly identified him. We disagree.
At the hearing, the presentment agency conceded that errors had been made concerning the police precinct showup identification of the appellant by the complainants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
