COSTILLO v. STATE

No. CR 86-212.

728 S.W.2d 153 (1987)

292 Ark. 43

Fabian COSTILLO, Appellant, v. STATE of Arkansas, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 27, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubbard, Patton, Peek, Haltom & Roberts by William G. Bullock, Texarkana, Tex., Lavender, Rochelle, Barnette, Franks & Arnold by Jerry A. Rochelle, Texarkana, for appellant.

Steve Clark, Atty. Gen. by Mary Beth Sudduth, Asst. Atty. Gen., Little Rock, for appellee.


PURTLE, Justice.

The appellant filed a Rule 37 petition in the trial court on June 17, 1985. The appellant's primary argument for post-conviction relief is that he was denied his right to counsel as guaranteed by the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. He also argues that the submission to the jury of evidence of his prior convictions was in violation of Ark.Stat.Ann. § 41-1005 (Supp.1985). At a hearing on May 23, 1986, the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases