NORTHWEST CENT. PIPELINE CORP. v. KANSAS CORP. COMM'N

No. 56,917

240 Kan. 638 (1987)

732 P.2d 775

NORTHWEST CENTRAL PIPELINE CORPORATION; COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY; AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY; and K N ENERGY, INC.; Appellants, v. THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF KANSAS; MICHAEL LENNEN, Chairman; RICHARD C. (PETE) LOUX, Commissioner; PHILLIP R. DICK, Commissioner; and their respective successors in office; Appellees.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed February 20, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark H. Adams, II, of Adams & McCarthy, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Kent L. Jones and Orval E. Jones, of Hall, Estill, Hardwick, Gable, Collingsworth & Nelson, Inc., of Tulsa, Oklahoma, were with him on the briefs for appellant Northwest Central Pipeline Corporation.

Ralph R. Brock, of Morris, Laing, Evans, Brock & Kennedy, Chartered, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellants Cabot Petroleum Corporation, Northern Pump Company, Graham-Michaelis Corporation, and Kansas Petroleum, Incorporated.

Timothy E. McKee, of Triplett, Woolf & Garretson, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Eugenia K. Helm and Eric Brown, of Colorado Springs, Colorado, were with him on the briefs for appellant Colorado Interstate Gas Company.

Lee Thompson, of Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Swartz, of Wichita, argued the cause and was on the brief for appellant K N Energy, Incorporated.

Brian J. Moline, general counsel, argued the cause and James E. Browne, assistant general counsel, was with him on the brief for appellees.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

HERD, J.:

This case was originally before the Court in Northwest Cent. Pipeline Corp. v. Kansas Corp. Comm'n, 237 Kan. 248, 699 P.2d 1002 (1985). There, we upheld the district court's order affirming a Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC or Commission) order which amended paragraph (p) of the basic proration order for the Kansas Hugoton Gas Field...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases