Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's only contention on appeal, the People satisfied their burden of proving the defendant's guilt of the robbery charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The defendant merely challenges the credibility of the complainant, who testified that he had given the defendant $10 in response to his demand. The defendant argues that because money was never recovered and the complainant's testimony in that regard was uncorroborated...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.