1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 130 A.D.2d
  5. 130 A.D.2d 734 (1987)
 

SCHENCK v. HILL, LENT & TROESCHER

130 A.D.2d 734 (1987)

Richard K. Schenck et al., Appellants, v. Hill, Lent & Troescher, et al., Defendants Harold Freund, Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Meiselman, Boland, Reilly & Pittoni, Esqs., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

May 26, 1987

Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Special Term properly disqualified the third-party defendant law firm Meiselman, Boland, Reilly & Pittoni (hereinafter Meiselman) from representing the plaintiffs in their legal malpractice action against the defendants. Once Meiselman was impleaded as a third-party defendant, the plaintiffs had the right, pursuant to CPLR 1009, in the words of Special...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases