CUTWRIGHT v. CENT. BROOKLYN URBAN DEV. CORP.


127 A.D.2d 731 (1987)

Marion Cutwright et al., Respondents, v. Central Brooklyn Urban Development Corporation, Appellant, et al., Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 17, 1987


Ordered that the order is reversed, without costs or disbursements, the motion is granted, and the proposed amended verified answer is deemed served.

As a general rule, motions for leave to serve amended pleadings should be liberally granted unless the rights of the parties are substantially prejudiced (Andersen v University of Rochester, 91 A.D.2d 851). Where the party opposing a motion to serve an amended pleading cannot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases