Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals that the petitioner's three separate parcels, each with its own separate lot number and zoning classification, were not one lot under the zoning ordinance but three, was neither irrational nor unreasonable and must, therefore, be upheld (see, e.g., Matter of Albert v Board of Stds. & Appeals,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.