1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 400 N.W.2d
  5. 400 N.W.2d 447 (1987)
 

PEASLEE v. PEASLEE

No. CX-86-1511.

400 N.W.2d 447 (1987)

In re the Marriage of Mary H. PEASLEE, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Ernest M. PEASLEE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

February 10, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond M. Lazar, Mallory K. Mullins, Fredrikson & Byron, P.A., Minneapolis, for respondent.

William E. Haugh, Jr., Collins, Buckley, Sauntry & Haugh, St. Paul, for appellant.

Considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and LANSING and NIERENGARTEN, JJ., with oral argument waived.

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant contends the trial court erred in denying modification of maintenance. We conclude the trial court's errors in valuation did not affect the weight of the court's ultimate finding that the obligor did not suffer a substantial decrease in income.

FACTS

The parties, Mary and Ernest Peaslee, were married in June 1948. The amended judgment dissolving their marriage was entered

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases