1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 214 N.J.
  5. 214 N.J. Super. 631 (1987)
 

COMMITTEE, RICKEL ALTERNATIVE AND LINDEN MERCHANTS ASS'N v. CITY OF LINDEN

214 N.J. Super. 631 (1987)

520 A.2d 823

COMMITTEE FOR A RICKEL ALTERNATIVE AND LINDEN MERCHANTS ASSOCIATION, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF LINDEN AND SUPERMARKETS GENERAL CORPORATION, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 20, 1987.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert M. Rich argued the cause for appellants (Weitzman & Rich, attorneys).

Jerome Krueger, City Attorney, argued the cause for respondent City of Linden.

Charles N. Winetsky argued the cause for respondent Supermarkets General Corporation (Winetsky & Winetsky, attorneys).

Before Judges MORTON I. GREENBERG and GRUCCIO.

The opinion of the court was delivered by MORTON I. GREENBERG, P.J.A.D.

This matter comes on before the court on appeal from a decision upholding the granting of a use variance from its zoning ordinance by defendant, City of Linden, to defendant, Supermarkets General Corporation, for construction of a commercial property. Plaintiffs, Committee for a Rickel Alternative and Linden Merchants Association, are objectors to the variance. The question before this court is...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases