HILLESTAD v. HILLESTAD

No. C9-86-1824.

405 N.W.2d 436 (1987)

In re the Marriage of Parnell J. HILLESTAD, Petitioner, Respondent, v. Ruth M. HILLESTAD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Dismissed June 30, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dianne Wright, Janecek & Wright, New Brighton, for respondent.

Ragnhild Anne Westby, St. Paul, for appellant.

Heard, considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and HUSPENI and MULALLY, JJ.


OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

This appeal is from an order denying appellant's motion to continue spousal maintenance and alternatively to modify her share of respondent's pension within a 1983 property division. Appellant claims the evidence shows (1) without continued maintenance, appellant's income is substantially decreased while her needs and respondent's income have increased, rendering the original maintenance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases