Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment under CPL 30.30, inasmuch as the period between the filing of the complaint and the filing of the second indictment is not automatically chargeable to the People, even though the first indictment was dismissed based upon an alleged jurisdictional defect (see, People v Kopciowski,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.