U.S. v. DOE

No. 87-1380.

819 F.2d 11 (1987)

UNITED STATES, Appellee, v. John DOE, etc., Defendant, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Decided May 28, 1987.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Bachman and Hale, Sanderson, Byrnes & Morton, Boston, Mass., on brief, for defendant, appellant.

Deborah A. Ramirez, Asst. U.S. Atty., and Frank L. McNamara, Jr., U.S. Atty., Boston, Mass., on brief, for appellee.

Before BOWNES, TORRUELLA and SELYA, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

We affirm the district court's contempt order substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's April 20, 1987 memorandum and order. Appellant's immunized testimony in a future appearance before the grand jury cannot be used as evidence to prove a charge of perjury in giving false testimony in his prior appearance. United States v. Cintolo, 818 F.2d 980, 988 n. 5 (1st Cir.1987); In re Bianchi,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases