Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The court properly dismissed the appellant's counterclaim on the ground that it was barred by the doctrine of collateral estoppel. The appellant had a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issues raised on his counterclaim in a prior action brought by him, inter alia, against his brother, the director of the plaintiff corporations (see, Stone v Stone,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
